Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/yogesh-kumar-pathak
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Himachal Pradesh
Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak is one of 2,401 verified advocates listing Himachal Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
6 case categories · 7 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Vikrant @ Nona Vs. State Of H.P.DisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Una, Himachal PradeshHon'ble Judicial Magistrate First Class Court No. 2, Hon'ble Una
- Pankaj Sharma Vs. StateDisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)Chief Judicial Magistrate, Una, Himachal PradeshHon'ble Judicial Magistrate First Class Court No. 2, Hon'ble Una
- Harjinder Kumar Vs. StateDisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)Chief Judicial Magistrate, Una, Himachal PradeshHon'ble Judicial Magistrate First Class Court No. 2, Hon'ble Una
- Jaharuddin Mian& Ors. Vs. The State Of BiharDisposedCriminal MiscellaneousPatna High Court, Bihar - Single BenchHon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh
- Shri Govind Singh Dangwal Vs. Vishal Mega Mart Through Mookhey Chief Prevertan AdikasreDisposedConsumer ComplaintDCDRC - District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nainital, Uttarakhand - Nainital
- National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kiran Mehra& Ors.DisposedFirst AppealHigh Court of Uttarakhand, NainitalHon'ble B. C. Kandpal
- M/O Finance Vs. S C SrivastavaDisposedPetition for TransferCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
- M/O Finance Vs. Prem ChandDisposedPetition for TransferCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
- Ravi Prakash Srivastava Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Through Principal SecretaryFor OrdersSpecial Leave Petition (Civil)Supreme Court of India, New DelhiHon'ble Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Sandeep Mehta
- In Re: To Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies And Deficiencies In Criminal Trials Vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Chief SecretaryHearingMiscellaneous Application (Civil)Supreme Court of India, New DelhiHon'ble M.M. Sundresh, Hon'ble Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Himachal Pradesh
Principal High Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court · Capital: Shimla
The Himachal Pradesh High Court at Shimla was established in 1971 on the State's elevation. The HP Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972, the HP Land Revenue Act, 1954 and the HP Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 are central. Special-status restrictions on land transfer to non-residents (under §118 of the HP Tenancy Act) make property practice State-specific.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak been practising law?+
Yogesh Kumar Pathak was enrolled with the Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/yogesh-kumar-pathak — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Yogesh Kumar Pathak's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.