AAskadvocates.in

Adv. The Public Persecutor

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/the-public-persecutor
Enrolled
जन॰ 2015
Based in
Tamil Nadu
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. The Public Persecutor is one of 26,123 verified advocates listing Tamil Nadu as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ इस पृष्ठ की जानकारी अधिवक्ता द्वारा BCI नियम 36 के 2008 संशोधन के तहत तथ्यात्मक प्रकटीकरण के रूप में प्रदान की गई है। यह न तो विज्ञापन है और न ही याचना।

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 23 Jun 2026
Cases on record
83
Public data
Disposed
78
94%
Pending
5
6%
Courts engaged
9
1 case types
Outcome profile
78 closed · 5 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Practice composition

1 case categories · 51 total tags

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Danish So Santan Fernandes Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  2. Shridhar So Jagannath Tandel Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  3. Natedar So Saver Fernandes Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  4. Vijay So Victor Marshall Fernandes Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  5. Kaseem So Abdul Sab Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  6. Prakash So Gopal Tandel Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  7. Abdul Ameer So Mohammed Ullal Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  8. Felison Marsdhal Fernandes Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  9. Narayan So Rama Tandel Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
  10. Jaleel So Mohammed Sab Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep. By Deputy Commissioner, Karwar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka
    Hon'ble Prl. District Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Court U.K, Hon'ble Karwar
The Public Persecutor·Compiled from publicly available court records·9 pages of case history (≈ 90 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Tamil Nadu

Principal High Court: Madras High Court · Capital: Chennai

The Madras High Court, established in 1862, is one of India's three chartered High Courts with seats at Chennai and the Madurai Bench (since 2004). It has Original Side jurisdiction for the City of Chennai and Appellate Side jurisdiction state-wide. Tenancy follows the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017; stamp duty the Indian Stamp Act with Tamil Nadu amendments. The State has a separate Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry. The TNREAT (Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal) and the TN-RERA operate from Chennai.

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. The Public Persecutor's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. The Public Persecutor handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. The Public Persecutor been practising law?+
    The Public Persecutor was enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/the-public-persecutor — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. The Public Persecutor appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. The Public Persecutor consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. The Public Persecutor for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. The Public Persecutor's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in