AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Reply Filed

✓ BCI verified

Auto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/reply-filed
Enrolled
जन॰ 2015
Based in
Maharashtra
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Reply Filed is one of 101,826 verified advocates listing Maharashtra as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ इस पृष्ठ की जानकारी अधिवक्ता द्वारा BCI नियम 36 के 2008 संशोधन के तहत तथ्यात्मक प्रकटीकरण के रूप में प्रदान की गई है। यह न तो विज्ञापन है और न ही याचना।

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 25 Jun 2026
Cases on record
18
Public data
Disposed
17
94%
Pending
1
6%
Courts engaged
4
8 case types
Outcome profile
17 closed · 1 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Practice composition

8 case categories · 17 total tags

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. I.H.Sekar Vs. P.Ponnaiah Ias.
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Division Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Honourable Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
  2. Kamalakannan Vs. The State Of Tamilnadu
    DisposedHabeas Corpus Petition
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Division Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Dr.Justice R.N.Manjula, Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash
  3. Varadharaj.R Vs. The District Collector
    DisposedWrit Petition (Civil)
    Madras High Court, Madurai, Tamil Nadu - Division Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice P.Velmurugan
  4. Devaki Vs. The State Rep. By Its
    DisposedHabeas Corpus Petition
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Division Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar, Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice Rajiv Shakdher
  5. N.P.Sons Construct Vs. Vinoth Kumar I.F.S
    DisposedContempt Petition
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam
  6. Shriram Life Insurance Company Ltd Vs. The State Rep.By
    DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
  7. High Court Vs. The Correspondent
    DisposedContempt Petition
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh
  8. Aqua Pump Industries Vs. Sanjay Agarwal
    DisposedContempt Petition
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha
  9. Rashtriya Snehi Shikshan Sanstha Vs. Minister Of State For Edn.
    DisposedCivil Appeal
    Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, Maharashtra - Division
    Hon'ble M.B. Ghodeswar, Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice D.K. Trivedi
  10. Western Coalfield Ltd. Vs. Ramdas Construction Co.
    DisposedFirst Appeal
    Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, Maharashtra - Single
    Hon'ble G.D. Patil
Reply Filed·Compiled from publicly available court records

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Maharashtra

Principal High Court: Bombay High Court · Capital: Mumbai

Maharashtra is anchored by the Bombay High Court — established in 1862, one of India's three chartered High Courts — with principal seat at Mumbai and benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur and Goa (Panaji). The Court has Original and Appellate Side jurisdiction; commercial disputes above ₹3 lakh proceed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before the Commercial Division. Tenancy disputes follow the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; rural land matters the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Stamp duty is governed by the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, India's largest State Bar Council, regulates legal practice across the State.

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Reply Filed's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Reply Filed handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Reply Filed been practising law?+
    Reply Filed was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/reply-filed — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Reply Filed appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Reply Filed consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Reply Filed for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Reply Filed's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in