AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Quazi For Respondents

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of West Bengal
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/quazi-for-respondents
Enrolled
जन॰ 2015
Based in
West Bengal
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Quazi For Respondents is one of 32,977 verified advocates listing West Bengal as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ इस पृष्ठ की जानकारी अधिवक्ता द्वारा BCI नियम 36 के 2008 संशोधन के तहत तथ्यात्मक प्रकटीकरण के रूप में प्रदान की गई है। यह न तो विज्ञापन है और न ही याचना।

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 23 Jun 2026
Cases on record
14,277
Public data
Disposed
10,626
74%
Pending
3,651
26%
Courts engaged
254
51 case types
Outcome profile
10,626 closed · 3,651 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

High Courts
5 courts · 1,815 matters · 9% of total
Tribunals & Commissions
3 courts · 6 matters · 0% of total
District & subordinate courts
246 courts · 17,597 matters · 91% of total
+ 240 more district & subordinate courts

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Akot1,659Nagpur1,318Patur1,237Georai690Aurangabad655Phulambri595Partur384Bhandara340Umrer324Akola319Kinwat305Mandla132Bardhaman107Pryagraj103Basirhat101Muzaffarnagar93Kanpur Nagar77Junior Division Uluberia76Uluberia71Indore67

Practice composition

51 case categories · 8,465 total tags

+ 43 other case types tracked

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Syed Shaukat Syed Jabbar Vs. Sheshrao Savitra Gangawane
    DisposedCivil Suit
    Civil and Criminal Court, Phulambri, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jd And Jmfc, Hon'ble Phulambri
  2. Santosh Abaji Gaikwad Vs. Pandurang Bhikaji Gaikwad
    DisposedCivil Suit
    Civil and Criminal Court, Phulambri, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jd And Jmfc, Hon'ble Phulambri
  3. Bismilla Bi Mehboob Shaikh Vs. Feroz Khan Hanif Khan
    DisposedMotor Accident Claims Appeal
    District and Sessions Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Adhoc District Judge 4 Asstt. Sessions Judge Abad.
  4. Mohammed Kasim Mohamd Shamoddin Vs. Asma Begum Mohd. Kasim
    PendingCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)
    Additional District and Sessions Judge, Basmath, Hingoli, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Adhoc Dist.Judge 1 And Addl.Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Basmath
  5. Narendra Mahadeo Kalaskar Vs. Pandhari Kachruji Rojtkar
    PendingCivil Suit
    Civil Court Senior Division, Akola, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble 5th Jt. Civil Judge S.D. And Addl.Cjm Akola
  6. Chhote S/O Bhojya& Ors. Vs. Mannu S/O Bhikari
    DisposedSecond Appeal
    Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, Maharashtra - Single
    Hon'ble A. P. Lavande
  7. M.S.E.D.C.L. Vs. M/S Diamond Ice Factory
    DisposedCivil Suit
    Civil Court Junior Division, Kamptee, Nagpur, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Jmfc Kamptee
  8. State Of Mah.Thr.Inspector Sefs Akola Vs. Giridhar Surajmal Khandelwal
    DisposedCivil Miscellaneous Application
    Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, Maharashtra - Division
    Hon'ble J.N. Patel, Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari
  9. State Of Maharashtra P.S. Kinwat Vs. Sk. Majhar @ Nandu Sk. Vakil
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Civil Court Junior Division, Kinwat, Nanded, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge J D, Hon'ble J.M.F.C. Kinwat
  10. Sunita Vitthal Tayade Vs. Swapnil Pravin Gaikwad
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Civil Court Junior Division, Akot, Akola, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge J.D. Jmfc Akot
Quazi For Respondents·Compiled from publicly available court records·1,428 pages of case history (≈ 14,280 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in West Bengal

Principal High Court: Calcutta High Court · Capital: Kolkata

The Calcutta High Court (1862) is among India's three chartered High Courts — with original civil jurisdiction over the city of Kolkata and a Circuit Bench at Port Blair (Andaman and Nicobar Islands). Tenancy follows the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997; stamp duty the Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act. The Bar Council of West Bengal regulates the profession. The Calcutta HC's Original Side has a distinctive Master's system inherited from its Letters-Patent jurisdiction.

All advocates in West Bengal →

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Quazi For Respondents's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Quazi For Respondents handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Quazi For Respondents been practising law?+
    Quazi For Respondents was enrolled with the Bar Council of West Bengal in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/quazi-for-respondents — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Quazi For Respondents appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Quazi For Respondents consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Quazi For Respondents for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Quazi For Respondents's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in