Adv. Naim Akhatar
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/naim-akhatar
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Naim Akhatar is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Judicial MagistrateJaipur Metro HQ, Rajasthan5
- District & Additional Sessions JudgeKota District HQ, Rajasthan3
- Bail Application2
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)2
- Muzaffarpur District Judge DivisionBihar2
- Chief Judicial MagistrateAmravati, Maharashtra2
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
6 case categories · 15 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- State Vs. Chotu AnsariDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Kota District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Civil Judge And Jm No.4 South
- State Government Vs. Kaluram Urf KaluPendingCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Jaipur Metro HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Acj Cum Jm-6 Jaipur Metropolitan I
- Ramblab Agarwal Vs. Ashish LodhaDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Jaipur Metro HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Special Jm Ni Act No.-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
- S.S. Jain Vs. Rajesh GuptaDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Jaipur II Metro HQ, Jaipur Metro II, RajasthanHon'ble Acj Cum Jm 8
- Umrav Luhar Vs. State GovernmentDisposedBail ApplicationDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Jaipur II Metro HQ, Jaipur Metro II, RajasthanHon'ble Adj-6
- Mahendra Sharma Vs. StateDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Kota District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble A.D.J. No.4
- Abdul Shamim Vs. State Of BiharDisposedCriminal RevisionMuzaffarpur District Judge Division, BiharHon'ble Dasj-5
- Laxman Bhai Bujarati Vs. Ashish LodhaDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Jaipur Metro HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Special Jm Ni Act No.-3 Jaipur Metropolitan I
- Deepak Kumar Meghwal Vs. Shakeel KureshiDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Kota District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Spl. Jm Niact Cases No.-04
- Jinat Bano Vs. Abdul RasidDisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur Metro HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Addl. Sr. Civil Judge Cum Acjm -6 Jaipur Metropolitan I
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Naim Akhatar's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Naim Akhatar handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Naim Akhatar been practising law?+
Naim Akhatar was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/naim-akhatar — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Naim Akhatar appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Naim Akhatar consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Naim Akhatar for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Naim Akhatar's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.