Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/mohd-imran-ahmad
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Maharashtra
Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad is one of 101,826 verified advocates listing Maharashtra as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
6 case categories · 9 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Mohd. Bashir Vs. Mohd. IdrisDisposedSecond AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Mr/Mrs __________________________________
- Lallu Vs. ShakuntalaDisposedSecond AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Mr/Mrs __________________________________
- Chottemiyan Rajasaheb Vs. Rambhau Venkateshrao L.Rs. Gajendrarao& Ors.PendingSecond AppealBombay High Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble P.R. Borkar
- Feroz Begum Sk. Abdul Rahman Vs. Syeda Wajeda Ahmed Mir Ahmeduddin And Anr.PendingCivil AppealBombay High Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble According To Sitting List
- Akhil Bhartiya Adivasi Vikas Parishad Vs. The State Of Mah.& Ors.DisposedRent Control CaseBombay High Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra - SingleRegistrar
- Sk Parveen Sk Sattar Vs. The StateDisposedCivil Miscellaneous ApplicationCivil Court Senior Division, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, MaharashtraHon'ble Jt.Civil Judge S.D. Aurangabad.
- Kallu Ram Vs. Rakesh Kumar And OrsDisposedMotor Accident Claims AppealPrincipal District Judge (Civil), Rajouri, Jammu and KashmirHon'ble Principal District And Session Judge
- Inhabitants Of Village Buchoo Pattan Th.Manzoor Ahmad Bhat Vs. Union Territory Of JPendingWrit Petition (Civil)High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir - SINGLE BENCH
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Maharashtra
Principal High Court: Bombay High Court · Capital: Mumbai
Maharashtra is anchored by the Bombay High Court — established in 1862, one of India's three chartered High Courts — with principal seat at Mumbai and benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur and Goa (Panaji). The Court has Original and Appellate Side jurisdiction; commercial disputes above ₹3 lakh proceed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before the Commercial Division. Tenancy disputes follow the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; rural land matters the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Stamp duty is governed by the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, India's largest State Bar Council, regulates legal practice across the State.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad been practising law?+
Mohd Imran Ahmad was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/mohd-imran-ahmad — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Mohd Imran Ahmad's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.