Adv. Mata Sharan
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/mata-sharan
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Mata Sharan is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- District & Sessions JudgeVaranasi, Uttar Pradesh46
- Civil Judge (Junior Division)Chandauli, Uttar Pradesh41
- Civil Miscellaneous Application40
- Civil Judge (Junior Division)Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh35
- District & Sessions JudgeChandauli, Uttar Pradesh29
- Civil Judge (Junior Division)Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh15
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
8 case categories · 180 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Sohanalal Vs. Lalachandr And OthersPendingOriginal SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Varanasi, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.Cl.J.(Jd)-4
- Ramesh And Others Vs. Harinath Yadva And OthersPendingCivil Miscellaneous ApplicationCivil Judge (Senior Division), Pratapgarh, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.Cl.J.(S.D.)-3
- Lalta Prasad Vs. JagannathDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict & Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Special Judge /Addl. District Judge
- Ramesh Chandra Kodiya Vs. Ram Ji Lal Chandak And AnotherPendingCivil SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Chandauli, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) East
- Ramesh Chandra Kodiya Vs. Ram Ji Lal ChandakDisposedOriginal SuitCivil Judge (Senior Division), Pratapgarh, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge Sr. Divi. Ftc
- Anand Vs. State Of U.P.PendingOriginal SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Chandauli, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) East
- Hriday Narayan Pandey Vs. Dinesh Kumar SinghPendingCivil RevisionDistrict & Sessions Judge, Varanasi, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Xivth Additional District And Sessions Judge
- Shivraj Kumar Yadav Vs. Lalbahadur YadavPendingCivil SuitCivil Judge (Senior Division), Pratapgarh, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge - Sd / F.T.C.
- Narendra Singh Vs. Jujhar SinghDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict & Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Iiird Additional District And Sessions Judge
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Mata Sharan's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Mata Sharan handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Mata Sharan been practising law?+
Mata Sharan was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/mata-sharan — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Mata Sharan appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Mata Sharan consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Mata Sharan for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Mata Sharan's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.