Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/krishna-kant-pathak
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- District Judge Division RohtasBihar73
- Bail Application24
- Chief Judicial MagistrateDivision Rohtas, Bihar15
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)6
- Chief Judicial MagistrateMathura, Uttar Pradesh2
- District Judge Division BikramganjRohtas, Bihar2
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
10 case categories · 44 total tags
- Company Petition1739%
- Civil Division Rohtas, Bihar614%
- Criminal Revision511%
- Testamentary Suit511%
- Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)511%
- Original Suit25%
- Civil Suit12%
- Civil Appeal12%
+ 2 other case types tracked
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Bhola Sharma Vs. Vishvanath Sharma And OtherDisposedCompany PetitionChief Judicial Magistrate, Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble A.C.J.M.-Iv-Cum- Sub Judge-Xii
- Hare Ram Rai Vs. The State Of BiharDisposedBail ApplicationDistrict Judge Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble District, Hon'ble Sessions Judge
- Nitish Pandey Vs. State Of BiharPendingBail ApplicationDistrict Judge Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble District, Hon'ble Additional Sessions Judge-13
- Dhanjee Paswan Vs. State Of BiharDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict Judge Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble Additional District, Hon'ble Sessions Judge-Xxii
- Shobha Devi Vs. State Of BiharDisposedBail ApplicationDistrict Judge Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble Principal District, Hon'ble Sessions Judge
- Durga Kumari Vs. Bablu BindPendingCompany PetitionChief Judicial Magistrate, Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble S.D.J.M.
- Nitish Pandey Vs. State Of BiharPendingCriminal RevisionDistrict Judge Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble District, Hon'ble Additional Sessions Judge-1
- Safina Khatoon Vs. The State Of BiharDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict Judge Division Rohtas, BiharHon'ble Additional District, Hon'ble Sessions Judge- Iv
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak been practising law?+
Krishna Kant Pathak was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/krishna-kant-pathak — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Krishna Kant Pathak's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.