Adv. Imran Haider
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/imran-haider
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Imran Haider is one of 64,812 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Chief Judicial MagistrateLucknow, Uttar Pradesh10
- Civil Judge (Junior Division)Nawabganj, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh6
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)4
- Bail Application3
- District & Sessions JudgeLucknow, Uttar Pradesh3
- Miscellaneous Application (Civil)2
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
5 case categories · 16 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Noor Fatima Vs. Ali Amir Raza And OthersPendingCompany PetitionChief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J (Jd) Court No.34
- Usha Devi Vs. Hari ShankarDisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nawabganj, Bareilly, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge Junior Division
- Gulista Vs. Jalees Ahmad And Others.DisposedCriminal Complaint CaseCivil Judge (Junior Division), Nawabganj, Bareilly, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge Junior Division
- State Of U.P. Vs. Mohd.Aslam @ BilluDisposedBail ApplicationCivil Judge (Junior Division), Nawabganj, Bareilly, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge Junior Division
- State Of U.P. Vs. Chandra SenDisposedBail ApplicationCivil Judge (Junior Division), Nawabganj, Bareilly, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge Junior Division
- Rabab Fatima Vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education Deptt. Lko.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Brij Raj Singh
- Raju Vs. Kallu And OthersPendingCriminal Complaint CaseCivil Judge (Junior Division), Nawabganj, Bareilly, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge Junior Division
- Motin Vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. HomeDisposedCriminal Leave PetitionAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh, Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
- Raju Vs. Vinod Kumar MishraDisposedSessions CaseDistrict & Sessions Judge, Lucknow, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Spl.Judge(Sc/St Act)
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Imran Haider's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Imran Haider handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Imran Haider been practising law?+
Imran Haider was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/imran-haider — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Imran Haider appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Imran Haider consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Imran Haider for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Imran Haider's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.