AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Girish Patil

✓ BCI verified

Auto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/girish-patil
Enrolled
जन॰ 2015
Based in
Maharashtra
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Girish Patil is one of 101,826 verified advocates listing Maharashtra as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ इस पृष्ठ की जानकारी अधिवक्ता द्वारा BCI नियम 36 के 2008 संशोधन के तहत तथ्यात्मक प्रकटीकरण के रूप में प्रदान की गई है। यह न तो विज्ञापन है और न ही याचना।

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 24 Jun 2026
Cases on record
593
Public data
Disposed
356
60%
Pending
237
40%
Courts engaged
84
19 case types
Outcome profile
356 closed · 237 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

Supreme Court
1 court · 1 matters · 0% of total
High Courts
3 courts · 76 matters · 10% of total
District & subordinate courts
80 courts · 676 matters · 90% of total
+ 74 more district & subordinate courts

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Indapur94Bhiwandi84Bengaluru47Baramati43Osmanabad31Islampur22Thane20Borivali16Bengaluru Rural13Panvel13Bengaluru Urban12Mumbai8Pune7Vasai7Gadag6Aurangabad5Bandra4Kalyan3Dindoshi2Kolar2

Practice composition

19 case categories · 379 total tags

+ 11 other case types tracked

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Maruti Gampat Bhong Vs. Bitan Lahu Waikar
    DisposedCivil Suit
    Civil Judge (Senior Division), Indapur, Pune, Maharashtra
  2. The State Of Maharashtra Vs. Anil Namdeo Khamgal Etc. 2
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Civil Court, Indapur, Pune, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Junior Division, Hon'ble Indapur.
  3. The State Excise Dept Vs. Meri Nurial Kambarlekar
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Junior Division, Panvel, Raigad, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble 5th Jt.Civil Judge Jd And Jmfc Panvel
  4. The State Vs. Salim Ishak Mundu
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Junior Division, Panvel, Raigad, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble 3rd Jt.Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C. Panvel
  5. The State Vs. Madhukar Damu Katakari @ Naik
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Junior Division, Panvel, Raigad, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble 4th Jt.Civil Judge J.D.And J.M.F.C.Panvel
  6. Manoj Mahadev Angre Vs. Madhukar Patil
    PendingCriminal Complaint Case
    Junior Division, Panvel, Raigad, Maharashtra
  7. The State Vs. Dinesh Bama Phadake And Oths.
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Junior Division, Panvel, Raigad, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Jt.Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.Panvel
  8. The State Vs. Shekhar Pandurang Berde
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Junior Division, Panvel, Raigad, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble 2nd Jt.Civil Judgej.D.And J.M.F.C.Panvel
  9. The State Vs. Hitul Bharatbhai Rajani
    DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
    Junior Division, Panvel, Raigad, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble 7th Jt Civil Judge Jd And Jmfc Panvel
  10. Akshada Bhausaheb Zankar Vs. Bhausahe Sudhakar Zankar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
    Civil Court Senior Division, Nashik, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Hon'ble Addl. Cjm, Hon'ble Nashik
Girish Patil·Compiled from publicly available court records·60 pages of case history (≈ 600 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Maharashtra

Principal High Court: Bombay High Court · Capital: Mumbai

Maharashtra is anchored by the Bombay High Court — established in 1862, one of India's three chartered High Courts — with principal seat at Mumbai and benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur and Goa (Panaji). The Court has Original and Appellate Side jurisdiction; commercial disputes above ₹3 lakh proceed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before the Commercial Division. Tenancy disputes follow the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; rural land matters the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Stamp duty is governed by the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, India's largest State Bar Council, regulates legal practice across the State.

All advocates in Maharashtra →

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Girish Patil's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Girish Patil handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Girish Patil been practising law?+
    Girish Patil was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/girish-patil — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Girish Patil appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Girish Patil consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Girish Patil for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Girish Patil's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in