Adv. As Dhanivatsa
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/as-dhanivatsa
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. As Dhanivatsa is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
3 case categories · 11 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Ram Sewak Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Shishir Kumar
- Sur-Sari Devi Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Ashok Bhushan
- Chhotey Lal Vs. Additional Commissioner KanpurPendingWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Vikram Nath
- Brajendra Singh Yadav Vs. Union Of India& Ors.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble B.K. Narayana
- Dinesh Kumar Singh& Ors. Vs. Civil Judge Junior Division& Ors.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Ran Vijai Singh
- Gufran Ahmad Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Vineet Saran
- Kishan Kumar Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedBail ApplicationAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Vinod Prasad
- Brajendra Singh Yadav Vs. Union Of India& Ors.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Rajiv Sharma
- Raju Vs. State Of U.P.PendingCriminal Leave PetitionAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Ashok Kumar Roopanwal
- Sur-Sari Devi Vs. Mahendra Pratap Singh Kushwaha District Basic Shiksha Adhi.DisposedCivil Miscellaneous ApplicationAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Krishna Murari
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. As Dhanivatsa's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. As Dhanivatsa handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. As Dhanivatsa been practising law?+
As Dhanivatsa was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/as-dhanivatsa — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. As Dhanivatsa appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. As Dhanivatsa consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. As Dhanivatsa for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. As Dhanivatsa's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.