Adv. Aditya Nema
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Delhi
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/aditya-nema
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Delhi (NCT)
Adv. Aditya Nema is one of 10,385 verified advocates listing Delhi (NCT) as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
Practice composition
10 case categories · 26 total tags
- Writ Petition (Civil)1038%
- Criminal Miscellaneous727%
- Contempt Petition28%
- Writ Appeal14%
- First Appeal14%
- Second Appeal14%
- Income Tax Appeal14%
- Criminal Appeal (DC)14%
+ 2 other case types tracked
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Ansari Abdullah Vs. Aiims New DelhiDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)High Court of Delhi, DelhiHon'ble Vikas Mahajan
- Mahesh Sahu Vs. Sunil Kumar MalviPendingMiscellaneous Application (Civil)High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- Sanjay Singh Thakur Vs. Neetu ThakurDisposedFirst AppealHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- Jai Prakash Nema Vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- A.S.Padmanabha Vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshDisposedCriminal MiscellaneousHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- Jai Prakash Nema Vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshDisposedCivil Miscellaneous ApplicationHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- Mahila Grih Udyog Lijjat Papad Branch At Vs. Union Of IndiaDisposedWrit AppealHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- Mehroonnisa Vs. Wasim Ahmad AbbasiPendingSecond AppealHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- Ramkirti Singh Vs. The State Of M.P.DisposedCriminal Appeal (DC)High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
- Lakhan Vs. The State Of M.P.DisposedCriminal MiscellaneousHigh Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Delhi
Principal High Court: Delhi High Court · Capital: New Delhi
The Delhi High Court (established 1966) is the principal court for the National Capital Territory. It has Original Civil jurisdiction up to ₹2 crore and Appellate jurisdiction over the District Courts. The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 governs newer tenancies (older premises continue under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958). Stamp duty follows the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Delhi amendments. The Supreme Court of India, NCLT Principal Bench, the Competition Commission of India, the National Green Tribunal Principal Bench, the Securities Appellate Tribunal and the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench are all in Delhi. The Bar Council of Delhi regulates the profession.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Aditya Nema's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Aditya Nema handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Aditya Nema been practising law?+
Aditya Nema was enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/aditya-nema — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Aditya Nema appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Aditya Nema consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Aditya Nema for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Aditya Nema's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.