Adv. A Praveem Kumar
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/a-praveem-kumar
- Enrolled
- जन॰ 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. A Praveem Kumar is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- District & Additional Sessions JudgePhalodi District HQ, Rajasthan5
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)1
- Junior Civil CourtWarangal, Telangana1
- Chief Judicial MagistrateDivision Purnea, Bihar1
- Chief Judicial MagistrateFatehpur, Uttar Pradesh1
- Junior Civil CourtAllagadda, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh1
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
6 case categories · 8 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Chama Devi Vs. Nanka RamPendingCompany PetitionChief Judicial Magistrate, Division Purnea, BiharHon'ble Judicial Magistrate 1st Class
- Icici Bank Limited Vs. Abbaraboina VenkaiahDisposedOriginal SuitJunior Civil Court, Warangal, TelanganaHon'ble Ii Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Ii Addl. Judicial Magistrate Of First Class, Hon'ble Warangal
- Moti Lal Vs. MumalDisposedCivil SuitJudicial Magistrate (Civil), Phalodi District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Jm
- Smt. Saqooran Vs. StateDisposedUnrecognized case typeJudicial Magistrate (Criminal), Phalodi District HQ, Rajasthan
- Manish Vs. BabulalDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Phalodi District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Adj
- Mangilal Vs. TejsinghDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Phalodi District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Adj
- Mangilal Vs. TejsinghDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Phalodi District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Adj
- Yusuf Vs. Rajasthan GovernmentDisposedCriminal RevisionDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Phalodi District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Adj
- Hariom Vs. Mamta And OthersPendingCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate C N- 03
- Yeddula Chanti Obaiah Vs. Kunnduru SulochanaPendingOriginal SuitJunior Civil Court, Allagadda, Kurnool, Andhra PradeshHon'ble Junior Civil Judge
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. A Praveem Kumar's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. A Praveem Kumar handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. A Praveem Kumar been practising law?+
A Praveem Kumar was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/a-praveem-kumar — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. A Praveem Kumar appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. A Praveem Kumar consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. A Praveem Kumar for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. A Praveem Kumar's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.