AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Memo For Appearance

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/memo-for-appearance
Enrolled
जन॰ 2015
Based in
Uttar Pradesh
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Memo For Appearance is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ इस पृष्ठ की जानकारी अधिवक्ता द्वारा BCI नियम 36 के 2008 संशोधन के तहत तथ्यात्मक प्रकटीकरण के रूप में प्रदान की गई है। यह न तो विज्ञापन है और न ही याचना।

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 21 Jun 2026
Cases on record
33,544
Public data
Disposed
29,804
89%
Pending
3,740
11%
Courts engaged
115
49 case types
Outcome profile
29,804 closed · 3,740 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

High Courts
5 courts · 414 matters · 3% of total
District & subordinate courts
110 courts · 12,237 matters · 97% of total
+ 104 more district & subordinate courts

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Chennai2,709Kanpur Nagar2,288Rajamahendravaram1,294Madurai1,009Mumbai1,004Pratapgarh490Aurangabad283Chittoor228Tiruchirappalli211Aundipatti76Kadiri29Ferozepur18Dindugul13Narasannapeta13Payyannur11Basirhat8Chavakkad6Parappanagadi6Manapparai6Adilabad5

Practice composition

49 case categories · 27,823 total tags

+ 41 other case types tracked

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Official Assignee Vs. Lucky Enterprises& Ors.
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - Single
    Hon'ble S.J. Kathawalla
  2. Official Assignee Vs. 1. M/S. Jayshree Silk Mills& Ors.
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - Single
    Hon'ble S.J. Kathawalla
  3. Official Assignee Vs. Chintu Deven Tanna
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - Single
    Hon'ble S.J. Kathawalla
  4. Ms Sri Ramakrishna Textilesrep. Bym. Ramakrishna Vs. J. Bansidhar Rathi
    DisposedCriminal Appeal
    District Court, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
    Hon'ble I Addl.District And Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Rajamahendravaram
  5. Ram Pulp And Papers Ltd. Vs. Ram Pulp And Papers Ltd.
    PendingCompany Petition
    Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - Single
  6. Arun Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar Garg
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
    Hon'ble Civil Judge ( Jr.Division)
  7. Kailas Vs. Smt. Chhindana
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
    Hon'ble Civil Judge ( Jr.Division)
  8. The Union Of India Vs. Meenakshi Mission
    DisposedWrit Appeal
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Division Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar, Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice Elipe Dharma Rao
  9. Arvindbhai Ratilal Surati Vs. Hasmukhbhai Thakorebhai Patel
    DisposedSpecial Civil Application
    High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad
    Hon'ble Honourable Dr. Justice Ashokkumar C. Joshi
  10. The Union Of India Vs. Meenakshi Mission
    DisposedWrit Appeal
    Madras High Court, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Division Bench
    Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar, Hon'ble Honourable Mr Justice Elipe Dharma Rao
Memo For Appearance·Compiled from publicly available court records·3,355 pages of case history (≈ 33,550 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Uttar Pradesh

Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow

The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.

All advocates in Uttar Pradesh →

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Memo For Appearance's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Memo For Appearance handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Memo For Appearance been practising law?+
    Memo For Appearance was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/memo-for-appearance — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Memo For Appearance appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Memo For Appearance consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Memo For Appearance for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Memo For Appearance's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in