Adv. Vs Bahidar
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- State Bar Council of Odisha
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/vs-bahidar
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Odisha
Adv. Vs Bahidar is one of 13,255 verified advocates listing Odisha as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Civil Court KharsiyaRaigarh, Chhattisgarh120
- District and Sessions CourtRaigarh, Chhattisgarh18
- Sub Divisional Judicial MagistratePadampur, Bargarh, Odisha17
- Bail Application8
- Court ComplexRourkela at Birjapalli, Odisha7
- Chief Judicial MagistrateJharsuguda, Odisha6
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
8 case categories · 154 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Dilip Kumar Vs. Jagprit Singh SalujaPendingCivil SuitCivil Court Kharsiya, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
- Santosh Kumar Dansena Others Vs. Parvati Bai Dansena OthersPendingCivil SuitCivil Court Kharsiya, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble Civil Judge Senior Division Kharsiya
- Purnima Patel Vs. Kalyan Prasad SahuPendingCompany PetitionCivil Court Kharsiya, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble Add. Judge To The Court Of Civil Judge Senior Division Kharsiya
- Bhanupratap Patel Vs. Apekshasagar JadhawDisposedCompany PetitionCivil Court Kharsiya, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble Ii-Civil Judge Class-Ii And J.M.F.C.
- M/S D B Power Ltd. Through Rakesh Kumar Sinha Vs. Industry Pvt. Ltd. Through Vinamra RajPendingCompany PetitionChief Judicial Magistrate, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble Iv Civil Judge Junior Division Raigarh
- Vedmati Vs. Chandraram And OtherPendingCivil SuitCivil Court Kharsiya, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble Civil Judge Senior Division Kharsiya
- Preamlal Vs. Prahalad And OtherDisposedCivil SuitCivil Court Kharsiya, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble I-Civil Judge Class-2 And J.M.F.C.
- Nilambar Prasad And Others Vs. Kailash Chand And OthersPendingCivil SuitCivil Court Kharsiya, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
- Ku. Sarita Patnaik Vs. Aam Janta And OthersDisposedUnrecognized case typeCivil Court, Gharghoda, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble Civil Judge Senior Division Gharghora
- Satvant Singh Vs. Gurunam SinghPendingCivil SuitCivil Court, Gharghoda, Raigarh, ChhattisgarhHon'ble Civil Judge Junior Division Gharghora
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Odisha
Principal High Court: Orissa High Court · Capital: Bhubaneswar
The Orissa High Court at Cuttack (1948, originally Patna HC's Cuttack Circuit Bench) exercises full High Court jurisdiction. The Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 and the Odisha Survey and Settlement Act, 1958 govern land matters. Stamp duty follows the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with State amendments. The State Bar Council of Odisha is based at Cuttack.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Vs Bahidar's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Vs Bahidar handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Vs Bahidar been practising law?+
Vs Bahidar was enrolled with the State Bar Council of Odisha in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/vs-bahidar — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Vs Bahidar appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Vs Bahidar consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Vs Bahidar for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Vs Bahidar's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.