Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/sri-kedar-sahu
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu is one of 59,122 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Chief Judicial MagistrateHazaribag, Jharkhand936
- Principal District and Sessions Judge HazaribagJharkhand837
- Bail Application576
- Civil Judge (Senior Division)Ranchi, Jharkhand75
- Family CourtHazaribag, Jharkhand71
- Civil Judge (Junior Division)Ranchi, Jharkhand70
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
19 case categories · 1,345 total tags
- Criminal Complaint Case82761%
- Company Petition21716%
- Original Suit13710%
- Civil Suit423%
- Criminal Appeal312%
- Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)262%
- Motor Vehicle Compensation Case212%
- Writ Petition (Civil)141%
+ 11 other case types tracked
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Imtiyaz Ali Vs. Birendra Pd.MehtaPendingCompany PetitionChief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag, JharkhandHon'ble Judicial Magistrate 1st Class
- Md Faruk And Othrs Vs. Bibi Shama Parween And 4 OthrsDisposedOriginal SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Hazaribag, JharkhandHon'ble Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) -Iii
- State Of Jharkhand Vs. Annad Pd MethaPendingCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag, JharkhandHon'ble Judicial Magistrate 1st Class
- Bindiya Devi Vs. Sanjeet Kr.YadavPendingCompany PetitionChief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag, JharkhandHon'ble Judicial Magistrate 1st Class
- Reyasat Hussain Vs. Neyajuddin AnsariDisposedCivil SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Ranchi, JharkhandHon'ble Civil Judge Jr. Div
- Rajesh Mahto Vs. Rameshwar MahtoDisposedCivil SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Ranchi, JharkhandHon'ble Addl. C.J.J.D-Xxii (Incharge)
- Eto Pahan Vs. Shiv Prasad KhatikPendingCivil SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Ranchi, JharkhandHon'ble Addl. C.J.J.D-Xii
- Ashok Kumar Tiwary Vs. State Of JharkhandDisposedUnrecognized case typeCivil Court Complex, Ranchi (Main Building / 40 Court Building), JharkhandHon'ble Ajc- Xi
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu been practising law?+
Sri Kedar Sahu was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/sri-kedar-sahu — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Sri Kedar Sahu's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.