Where is Adv. Shri Tele's chambers located?

Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.

What areas of practice does Adv. Shri Tele handle?

Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.

How long has Adv. Shri Tele been practising law?

Shri Tele was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/shri-tele — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.

Which courts does Adv. Shri Tele appear before?

Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.

What languages can Adv. Shri Tele consult in?

Consultation languages are not yet listed.

How can I contact Adv. Shri Tele for a paid consultation?

Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.

Is Adv. Shri Tele's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?

No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

What kind of cases does Shri Tele handle?

Shri Tele's public-records case history is led by writ petition (civil) matters, alongside related civil and criminal proceedings.

Where does Shri Tele appear in court?

The most frequent court of appearance on the public record is Bombay High Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra. Other courts and tribunals are listed in the courts-of-appearance section above.

How many cases does Shri Tele have on record?

Public e-courts data lists 1,999 cases. This is a factual snapshot — not a ranking or endorsement.

Where is Shri Tele based?

Shri Tele's most active jurisdiction is Aurangabad, Maharashtra.

How can I consult Shri Tele?

Use the “Ask a paid question” or “Book consultation” buttons above. Initial communication is platform-mediated for safety; engagement letter terms apply.

Adv. Shri Tele

✓ BCI verified

Auto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council: Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
Enrollment No: ECOURTS-IMPORT/shri-tele
Enrolled: Jan 2015
Based in: Maharashtra

Years from enrolment

Courts registered

Languages

Public answers

Adv. Shri Tele is one of 101,826 verified advocates listing Maharashtra as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ Information on this page has been provided by the advocate as factual disclosure under the 2008 carve-out to BCI Rule 36. It is not an advertisement or a solicitation.

About

Public-records snapshot

Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 26 Jun 2026

Cases on record

1,999

Public data

Disposed

1,462

73%

Pending

537

27%

Courts engaged

28 case types

Outcome profile

1,462 closed · 537 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

High Courts

1 court · 2 matters · 0% of total

High Court of Karnataka
Bengaluru
2

Tribunals & Commissions

1 court · 21 matters · 1% of total

School Tribunal
Aurangabad, Maharashtra
21

District & subordinate courts

64 courts · 2,585 matters · 99% of total

+ 58 more district & subordinate courts

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Aurangabad701 Osmanabad487 Dhule335 Dharashiv147 Nashik118 Kallam66 Ambajogai23 Ambajaogai23 Latur12 Dindori7 Amalner6 Beed5 Nashikroad5 Sakri5 Gadhinglaj5 Malegaon4 Chennai3 Kalwan3 Tuljapur3 Nagpur2

Practice composition

28 case categories · 1,343 total tags

+ 20 other case types tracked

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

Indrarao Chandrarao Shitole Vs. Parag Ambadas Loharkar
DisposedCivil Suit
Civil Court Senior Division, Nashik, Maharashtra
Hon'ble 10th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Hon'ble Addl. Cjm, Hon'ble Nashik
Ramkrushan Arjun Desale Vs. Rohini Ramkrushan Desale
DisposedCivil Miscellaneous Application
Civil Court Senior Division, Dhule, Maharashtra
Hon'ble Jt. Civil Judge S.D. And Addl. Cjm, Hon'ble Dhule
Ambabai Baburao Gavali Vs. Madhukar Dinkar Patil Etc 3
DisposedMotor Accident Claims Appeal
District and Sessions Court, Dhule, Maharashtra
Hon'ble Member Of Mact Adhoc 1, Hon'ble Dhule
Sau. Meghana @ Punam Aniket Kankhar Dhangar Vs. Aniket @ Yogesh Raghunath Kankhar Dhangar
DisposedMiscellaneous Application (Civil)
Civil Court Senior Division, Dhule, Maharashtra
Hon'ble 2nd Jt Civil Judge S.D And Addl.Cjm Dhule
Sahebrao So Govindrao Koli Vs. Ravindra So Ramkrishna Mahajan
DisposedExecution Application (Civil)
District and Sessions Court, Osmanabad, Dharashiv, Maharashtra
Hon'ble District Judge -2 And Addl.Sessions Judge Osmanabad.
Priyadarshnai Mahila Nagri Sah Patsnatha Ltd Vs. Ramchandra Kechappa Dundge
DisposedCriminal Complaint Case
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj, Kolhapur, Maharashtra
Hon'ble 3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
Sindhu Uttam Khogare Onbehalf Vikas Prakash Gholave Vs. Parmeshwar Laxman Rathod
PendingCivil Suit
Civil Court Junior Division, Barshi, Solapur, Maharashtra
Hon'ble Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
Haridas Dhaklu Kamdi. Vs. Parvatabai Haridas Kamdi.
DisposedCivil Suit
Civil Court Senior Division, Nashik, Maharashtra
Hon'ble Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Hon'ble Addl. Cjm, Hon'ble Nashik
Tukaram Gambhire Vs. Dnyandeo Gambhire
DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)
District and Sessions Court, Osmanabad, Dharashiv, Maharashtra
Hon'ble District Judge -2 And Addl.Sessions Judge Osmanabad.
Shobha Gururaj Tavaskar Vs. Laxmibai W/O Shivaji Angre
PendingCivil Suit
Civil Court Junior Division, Kallam, Dharashiv, Maharashtra
Hon'ble 3rd Jt Civil Judge J.D. And Jmfc, Hon'ble Kallam

Shri Tele·Compiled from publicly available court records·200 pages of case history (≈ 2,000 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Maharashtra

Principal High Court: Bombay High Court · Capital: Mumbai

Maharashtra is anchored by the Bombay High Court — established in 1862, one of India's three chartered High Courts — with principal seat at Mumbai and benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur and Goa (Panaji). The Court has Original and Appellate Side jurisdiction; commercial disputes above ₹3 lakh proceed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before the Commercial Division. Tenancy disputes follow the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; rural land matters the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Stamp duty is governed by the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, India's largest State Bar Council, regulates legal practice across the State.

All advocates in Maharashtra →

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

Where is Adv. Shri Tele's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
What areas of practice does Adv. Shri Tele handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
How long has Adv. Shri Tele been practising law?+
Shri Tele was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/shri-tele — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
Which courts does Adv. Shri Tele appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
What languages can Adv. Shri Tele consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.
How can I contact Adv. Shri Tele for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
Is Adv. Shri Tele's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in

Other advocates in Maharashtra

Browse by category

Get in touch

Engagement letter terms apply. Initial communication is platform-mediated for safety.

Modes available

✓ Video consultation (LiveKit)
✓ Phone consultation (masked number)
✓ In-person at chambers

At a glance

Shri Tele has 1,999 cases on the public e-courts record, with the primary practice based in Maharashtra.
Most frequent court of appearance: Bombay High Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra (677 matters).
Cases on record span 66 distinct courts/tribunals.
Most-handled case category: Writ Petition (Civil).
Public records show 200 pages of case history for this advocate.

Top advocates in Maharashtra

Frequently asked

›What kind of cases does Shri Tele handle?
Shri Tele's public-records case history is led by writ petition (civil) matters, alongside related civil and criminal proceedings.
›Where does Shri Tele appear in court?
The most frequent court of appearance on the public record is Bombay High Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra. Other courts and tribunals are listed in the courts-of-appearance section above.
›How many cases does Shri Tele have on record?
Public e-courts data lists 1,999 cases. This is a factual snapshot — not a ranking or endorsement.
›Where is Shri Tele based?
Shri Tele's most active jurisdiction is Aurangabad, Maharashtra.
›How can I consult Shri Tele?
Use the “Ask a paid question” or “Book consultation” buttons above. Initial communication is platform-mediated for safety; engagement letter terms apply.

Information on this page is published by the advocate as factual disclosure under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out. We do not host client testimonials, star ratings, or rankings.