Adv. Sh Madan
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttarakhand
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/sh-madan
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttarakhand
Adv. Sh Madan is one of 3,796 verified advocates listing Uttarakhand as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Civil Judge (Senior Division)Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar, Punjab100
- Civil Miscellaneous Application31
- Civil Judge (Senior Division)Kurukshetra, Haryana26
- Execution Application (Civil)25
- Unknown Court23
- Bail Application15
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
17 case categories · 228 total tags
- Civil Suit13760%
- Criminal Complaint Case3616%
- Civil Appeal198%
- Original Suit73%
- Motor Accident Claims Appeal52%
- Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)42%
- Company Petition31%
- Criminal Miscellaneous31%
+ 9 other case types tracked
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Gopichand Gadia Vs. StateDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Adj Ii
- Praveen Singla Vs. JaijhandDisposedUnrecognized case typeJudicial Magistrate, Hanumangarh District HQ, Rajasthan
- Regd. Firm Ms Partapa Ram Rice Mills Ambala Hiss Vs. Ms Nagpal Rice MillsDisposedCivil SuitCivil Judge (Senior Division) Court, Pehowa, Kurukshetra, HaryanaHon'ble Civil Judge (Junior Division)
- Piara Singh Vs. Darshan SinghDisposedCivil Miscellaneous ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar, PunjabHon'ble Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)
- State Of Haryana Vs. Som KumarPendingUnrecognized case typeDistrict and Sessions Court, Bhiwani, HaryanaHon'ble Additional District And Sessions Judge
- State Vs. Sunil KumarDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, RajasthanHon'ble Jm
- Ms Sweta Chauhan Vs. Gensol Consultant Pvt.Ltd.DisposedOriginal SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division) Dehradun, UttarakhandHon'ble 2nd Addl Civil Judge (Jr. Div)
- Sukhram Singh Bist Vs. Smt KuntiDisposedOriginal SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division) Dehradun, UttarakhandHon'ble 2nd Addl Civil Judge (Jr. Div)
- Akanksha Vs. Nachhattar SinghDisposedExecution Application (Civil)District and Sessions Court, Patiala, PunjabHon'ble Additional District And Sessions Judge -5
- Vikram Singh Vs. Mahinder SinghDisposedCivil SuitCivil Judge (Senior Division), Kurukshetra, Haryana
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttarakhand
Principal High Court: Uttarakhand High Court · Capital: Dehradun
The Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital was established in 2000. The UP Tenancy and UP Zamindari Abolition Acts continue to apply (Uttarakhand inherited UP laws on bifurcation), as do the UP Stamp Act. The Uttarakhand State Bar Council is at Nainital. Notable forums include the Uttarakhand RERA and the State Lokayukta.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Sh Madan's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Sh Madan handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Sh Madan been practising law?+
Sh Madan was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttarakhand in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/sh-madan — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Sh Madan appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Sh Madan consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Sh Madan for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Sh Madan's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.