Adv. S C Katiyar
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/s-c-katiyar
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. S C Katiyar is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Chief Judicial MagistrateFarrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh17
- Civil Judge (Junior Division)Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh4
- District & Sessions JudgeFarrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh3
- Civil Judge (Senior Division)Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh2
- Sessions Case1
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)1
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
4 case categories · 25 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- State Government Vs. VinodDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
- State Government Vs. Akhilesh Singh ChauhanDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
- State Government Vs. Tinku KumarDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
- State Government Vs. Ramesh ChandraDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
- State Government Vs. Ajay AnmolDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
- State Government Vs. PrahladDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
- State Government Vs. Kaushal KumarDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
- State Government Vs. Sughra@Sughar SinghDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh
- State Government Vs. Ram SwarupPendingSessions CaseDistrict & Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Addl District And Sessions Judge Court No 9
- State Government Vs. Vasudev OthersDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, Uttar PradeshHon'ble A.C.J.M.(Railway)
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. S C Katiyar's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. S C Katiyar handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. S C Katiyar been practising law?+
S C Katiyar was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/s-c-katiyar — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. S C Katiyar appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. S C Katiyar consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. S C Katiyar for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. S C Katiyar's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.