Adv. Rajmal Mehta
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/rajmal-mehta
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Madhya Pradesh
Adv. Rajmal Mehta is one of 18,360 verified advocates listing Madhya Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- District and Sessions CourtNeemuch, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh477
- Sessions Case126
- Regular Civil Suit - Class B97
- Regular Civil Suit - Class A61
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application11
- Execution Application (Civil)7
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
6 case categories · 119 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Vimahl Gopawat Vs. Anil JainPendingCriminal Revision (DC)District and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya PradeshHon'ble Special Judge For Cases Under Sc/St P.A. Act
- Sanjay Kachara Vs. Jakir HussainDisposedSessions CaseDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya PradeshHon'ble Iii Civil Judge Class-I
- Narayandas Baheti Vs. Shantilal GurjarDisposedRegular Civil Suit - Class BDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh
- Dosi Brothers Vs. Ms Makwana Sadi CenterDisposedRegular Civil Suit - Class BDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh
- Laxminarayan Vs. HeerasinghDisposedCivil AppealDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh
- Shikharchand Pagariya Vs. Sangita SenPendingSessions CaseDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya PradeshHon'ble Iii Civil Judge Class-I
- Anil Kothari Vs. Praveen PanchalPendingSessions CaseDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya PradeshHon'ble Ii Additional Judge To I Civil Judge Senior Division
- Gendmal Laxminarayan Baheti And Co. Jeeran Distt-Neemuch Byy Narayandas Vs. Gattusingh RajputDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh
- Asha Devi Kothari Vs. Farm Sharma Brothers Neemuch Kentt By Rameshchandra SharmaDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh
- Rajdeep Trading Company Vs. Firm Lakshmi TradersDisposedRegular Civil Suit - Class BDistrict and Sessions Court, Neemuch, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Madhya Pradesh
Principal High Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court · Capital: Bhopal
The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur, with benches at Indore and Gwalior, was established in 1956. The MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 is among the most-litigated statutes; the MP Accommodation Control Act, 1961 governs rent control. The State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh handles advocate enrolment through the MPOnline state portal — a digital integration uncommon for State Bar Councils.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Rajmal Mehta's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Rajmal Mehta handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Rajmal Mehta been practising law?+
Rajmal Mehta was enrolled with the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/rajmal-mehta — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Rajmal Mehta appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Rajmal Mehta consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Rajmal Mehta for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Rajmal Mehta's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.