AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Nirmala Nayak

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
State Bar Council of Odisha
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/nirmala-nayak
Enrolled
Jan 2015
Based in
Odisha
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Nirmala Nayak is one of 16,878 verified advocates listing Odisha as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ Information on this page has been provided by the advocate as factual disclosure under the 2008 carve-out to BCI Rule 36. It is not an advertisement or a solicitation.

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 22 Jun 2026
Cases on record
744
Public data
Disposed
516
69%
Pending
228
31%
Courts engaged
17
14 case types
Outcome profile
516 closed · 228 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Practice composition

14 case categories · 473 total tags

+ 6 other case types tracked

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Rajan Vs. Union Of India
    PendingWrit Petition (Civil)
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
  2. Ramratan Tiwari Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
    PendingWrit Petition (Civil)
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
  3. Gaurav Singh Ray Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
    DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
  4. Baljeet Singh Bhatia Vs. Amrita Bhatia
    DisposedCivil Miscellaneous Application
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
  5. Laxmi Kant Paspola Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
    DisposedContempt Petition
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
  6. Vaheed Khan Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
    PendingCriminal Appeal (DC)
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
  7. Deepak Kumar Tiwari Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
    PendingWrit Petition (Civil)
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
  8. Jitendra Singh Rajput Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
    PendingCriminal Miscellaneous
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior
  9. West Central Railway Employees Union Office Vs. Union Of India
    PendingWrit Petition (Civil)
    High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Nirmala Nayak·Compiled from publicly available court records·75 pages of case history (≈ 750 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Odisha

Principal High Court: Orissa High Court · Capital: Bhubaneswar

The Orissa High Court at Cuttack (1948, originally Patna HC's Cuttack Circuit Bench) exercises full High Court jurisdiction. The Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 and the Odisha Survey and Settlement Act, 1958 govern land matters. Stamp duty follows the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with State amendments. The State Bar Council of Odisha is based at Cuttack.

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Nirmala Nayak's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Nirmala Nayak handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Nirmala Nayak been practising law?+
    Nirmala Nayak was enrolled with the State Bar Council of Odisha in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/nirmala-nayak — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Nirmala Nayak appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Nirmala Nayak consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Nirmala Nayak for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Nirmala Nayak's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in