Adv. Mohd Faruk
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/mohd-faruk
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Mohd Faruk is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- District & Additional Sessions JudgeJaipur II Metro HQ, Jaipur Metro II, Rajasthan10
- Bail Application9
- Judicial MagistrateBikaner District HQ, Rajasthan7
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)4
- Family CourtBikaner District HQ, Rajasthan4
- District & Additional Sessions JudgeBikaner District HQ, Rajasthan4
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
8 case categories · 23 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- State Of Uttar Pradesh Vs. RamavtarDisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Budaun, Uttar PradeshHon'ble C.J.M.
- Ravindra Vs. StateDisposedBail ApplicationDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikaner District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Adj I
- Sadik Ali Vs. Bhanwar LalPendingCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Bikaner District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Spl. Jm N.I. Act No.3
- Navaj Sharif Vs. Prithavi SinghDisposedCompany PetitionJudicial Magistrate, Bikaner District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Spl. Jm N.I. Act No.1
- Salauddeen Vs. State Government Of U.P.DisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Judicial Magistrate
- Sikandra Ali Vs. Vikash JangidPendingCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Bikaner District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Spl. Jm N.I. Act No.3
- Abbas Khan Vs. Ajaj AehmadPendingCompany PetitionJudicial Magistrate, Bikaner District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Spl. Jm N.I. Act No.3
- Mohd. Sadik Vs. State Of GovernmentPendingCriminal Complaint CaseJudicial Magistrate, Jaipur II Metro HQ, Jaipur Metro II, RajasthanHon'ble Addl. Sr. Civil Judge Cum Acjm -6
- Washim Raja Vs. State Of Rajasthan@AppDisposedBail ApplicationDistrict & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikaner District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Adj I
- Imran Vs. MukeshPendingCompany PetitionJudicial Magistrate, Bikaner District HQ, RajasthanHon'ble Spl. Jm N.I. Act No.3
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Mohd Faruk's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Mohd Faruk handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Mohd Faruk been practising law?+
Mohd Faruk was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/mohd-faruk — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Mohd Faruk appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Mohd Faruk consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Mohd Faruk for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Mohd Faruk's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.