Adv. Mahendra Patap
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/mahendra-patap
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Mahendra Patap is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Chief Judicial MagistrateAyodhya, Uttar Pradesh14
- Bail Application13
- Civil Miscellaneous Application3
- Allahabad High CourtPryagraj, Uttar Pradesh2
- Civil Judge (Junior Division)Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh2
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)1
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
3 case categories · 5 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Ram Khelawan Vs. CollectorDisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble D.P. Singh
- Dr. Chandramukhi Yadav Vs. State Of U.P.& Ors.DisposedWrit AppealAllahabad High Court, Pryagraj, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble Virendra Vikram Singh, Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh
- Anand Alias Anandi Vs. State Of UpDisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate(C.J.M.)
- Anand Alias Anandi Vs. State Of UpDisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate(C.J.M.)
- Rangbahadur Vs. Kamla SinghPendingCivil SuitCivil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahganj
- Sarswati Vs. Badri And OthersPendingCivil Miscellaneous ApplicationCivil Judge (Junior Division), Azamgarh, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court Number 19
- Sagar Alias Bhola Vs. State Of UpDisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate(C.J.M.)
- Rinku And 1 Other Vs. State Of UpDisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Judicial Magistrate
- Anshul Vs. State Of UpDisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-I
- Mahipat Singh And Othear Vs. State Of UpDisposedBail ApplicationChief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya, Uttar PradeshHon'ble Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Div)-Ii, Hon'ble Skb.
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Mahendra Patap's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Mahendra Patap handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Mahendra Patap been practising law?+
Mahendra Patap was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/mahendra-patap — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Mahendra Patap appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Mahendra Patap consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Mahendra Patap for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Mahendra Patap's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.