AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Katyayan Misra

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/katyayan-misra
Enrolled
Jan 2015
Based in
Uttar Pradesh
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Katyayan Misra is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ Information on this page has been provided by the advocate as factual disclosure under the 2008 carve-out to BCI Rule 36. It is not an advertisement or a solicitation.

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 21 Jun 2026
Cases on record
5
Public data
Disposed
5
100%
Pending
0
0%
Courts engaged
2
1 case types
Outcome profile
5 closed · 0 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

District & subordinate courts
2 courts · 6 matters · 100% of total

Practice composition

1 case categories · 4 total tags

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Ambika Prasad Awasthi U/A 227 Vs. Tehsildar Tehsil Bakhsi Ka Talab Distt. Lucknow And Anr.
    DisposedSpecial Civil Application
    Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Satyendra Singh Chauhan
  2. Reena Tripathi Vs. State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secondary Medical Health And Famil
    DisposedWrit Appeal
    Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi
  3. Ram Phal& Ors. Vs. District Judge Lakhimpur Kheri& Ors.
    DisposedWrit Appeal
    Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta
  4. Ramdevi Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Govt. And 2 Ors
    DisposedWrit Appeal
    Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Sudhir Kumar Saxena
  5. Pawan Kumar Yadav Vs. The State Of U.P Thru Secy. Secy. Deptt. Lucknow
    DisposedWrit Appeal
    Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single Bench
    Hon'ble Anil Kumar
Katyayan Misra·Compiled from publicly available court records

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Uttar Pradesh

Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow

The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.

All advocates in Uttar Pradesh →

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Katyayan Misra's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Katyayan Misra handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Katyayan Misra been practising law?+
    Katyayan Misra was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/katyayan-misra — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Katyayan Misra appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Katyayan Misra consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Katyayan Misra for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Katyayan Misra's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in