Adv. K Tabassum
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of West Bengal
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/k-tabassum
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- West Bengal
Adv. K Tabassum is one of 42,216 verified advocates listing West Bengal as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
4 case categories · 8 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Kalidas Bandhapadhaya Vs. State Of West BengalDisposedWrit AppealCalcutta High Court, West Bengal - Single BenchHon'ble Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi (27.06.2011 - 29.08.2020)
- Atc Telecoim Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Kalyan Dombivali Municipal CorporationDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - DivisionHon'ble S.V. Gangapurwala, Hon'ble Shri Arif S. Doctor
- Shridhar Kachru Mhaskar Vs. Pramod Vasant ChoudharyPendingCriminal Complaint CaseUnknown CourtHon'ble 2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C Chikhloli-Ambernath
- Shridhar Kachru Mhaskar Vs. Pramod Vasant ChoudharyDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseCivil Court Junior Divison, Ulhasnagar, Thane, MaharashtraHon'ble 3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Ulhasnagar
- Vishal Prakash Bankar Vs. Gangaram Sakharam Tambada And 4 OthersPendingCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)Judicial Magistrate (FC) Court 3, Kalyan, Thane, MaharashtraHon'ble 5th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Kalyan
- Gulab Rajjak Mulla Vs. The Pune Municipal Corporation Thr. CommissionerPendingWrit Petition (Civil)Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - Division
- Pramod Kumar Vs. State Of UttarakhandDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)High Court of Uttarakhand, Nainital - Single BenchHon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari
- Ruma Bi Vs. State Of UttarakhandDisposedWrit Petition (Criminal)High Court of Uttarakhand, Nainital - Division BenchHon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit
- Madan Lal Vs. State Of UttarakhandDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)High Court of Uttarakhand, Nainital - Single BenchHon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari
- Kashmir Singh Vs. State Of UttarakhandPendingUnrecognized case typeHigh Court of Uttarakhand, Nainital - Single BenchHon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in West Bengal
Principal High Court: Calcutta High Court · Capital: Kolkata
The Calcutta High Court (1862) is among India's three chartered High Courts — with original civil jurisdiction over the city of Kolkata and a Circuit Bench at Port Blair (Andaman and Nicobar Islands). Tenancy follows the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997; stamp duty the Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act. The Bar Council of West Bengal regulates the profession. The Calcutta HC's Original Side has a distinctive Master's system inherited from its Letters-Patent jurisdiction.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. K Tabassum's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. K Tabassum handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. K Tabassum been practising law?+
K Tabassum was enrolled with the Bar Council of West Bengal in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/k-tabassum — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. K Tabassum appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. K Tabassum consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. K Tabassum for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. K Tabassum's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.