Adv. Inperson Jail
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/inperson-jail
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Inperson Jail is one of 78,582 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
Practice composition
1 case categories · 11 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Suresh Vs. State Of U.P.Jail AppealDisposedCriminal AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Mr/Mrs __________________________________
- Vikram Vs. State Of U.P.Jail AppealDisposedCriminal AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Mr/Mrs __________________________________
- Naseem Babu Jail Appeal Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedUnrecognized case typeAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, Hon'ble Anil Kumar Srivastava-Ii
- Mohanlal Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedUnrecognized case typeAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, Hon'ble Anil Kumar Srivastava-Ii
- Arjun Magar Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedUnrecognized case typeAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Mahendra Dayal
- Anil Dharti Magar Jail Appeal Vs. State Of U.P.DisposedUnrecognized case typeAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Single BenchHon'ble Mahendra Dayal
- Masoom Khan Vs. State Of U.P.Jail AppealPendingCriminal AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble Mohd. Aslam
- Nand Kishore Vs. State Of U.P.Jail AppealPendingCriminal AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble Mohd. Aslam
- Shrawan Kumar Vs. State Of U.P. Jail AppealDisposedCriminal AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble Dharam Vir Sharma, Hon'ble R. C. Deepak
- Ram Lakhan Soni In Jail Vs. State Of U.P.Jail AppealDisposedCriminal AppealAllahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Uttar Pradesh - Division BenchHon'ble M.K. Mittal, Hon'ble Abdul Mateen
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Inperson Jail's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Inperson Jail handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Inperson Jail been practising law?+
Inperson Jail was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/inperson-jail — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Inperson Jail appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Inperson Jail consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Inperson Jail for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Inperson Jail's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.