Adv. Geetanjali Sharma
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/geetanjali-sharma
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. Geetanjali Sharma is one of 26,513 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Chief Judicial MagistrateMandi, Himachal Pradesh245
- Civil Judge (Senior Division)Mandi, Himachal Pradesh245
- District and Sessions CourtMandi, Himachal Pradesh145
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)99
- Miscellaneous Application (Civil)61
- Original Application43
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
18 case categories · 646 total tags
- Civil Suit29045%
- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal17627%
- Domestic Violence Case6610%
- Criminal Complaint Case528%
- Civil Appeal173%
- Company Petition122%
- Writ Petition (Civil)61%
- Criminal Appeal41%
+ 10 other case types tracked
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- State Of Hp Vs. AmardeepPendingSessions CaseDistrict and Sessions Court, Mandi, Himachal PradeshHon'ble District And Sessions Judge
- Bandna Kumari Vs. Gurdial SinghDisposedMotor Vehicle Compensation CaseDistrict and Sessions Court, Mandi, Himachal PradeshHon'ble Additional District And Sessions Judge (I)
- National President Airrsa Vedpal Badgujar Vs. Railway BoardPendingOriginal ApplicationCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
- Ranvir Singh Vs. M/O DefenceDisposedMiscellaneous ApplicationCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
- Parvesh Kumar Vs. Home AffairsPendingOriginal ApplicationCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
- Ranjan Verma Vs. M/O RailwaysPendingOriginal ApplicationCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
- Srnt Adib Fatema Nomani Vs. Delhi PolicePendingOriginal ApplicationCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
- Madhu Bala Sharma Vs. Home AffairsPendingOriginal ApplicationCAT - Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, Delhi - CGAT Delhi
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Geetanjali Sharma's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Geetanjali Sharma handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Geetanjali Sharma been practising law?+
Geetanjali Sharma was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/geetanjali-sharma — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Geetanjali Sharma appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Geetanjali Sharma consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Geetanjali Sharma for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Geetanjali Sharma's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.