Adv. Chitins Vaithy
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/chitins-vaithy
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Maharashtra
Adv. Chitins Vaithy is one of 101,826 verified advocates listing Maharashtra as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
4 case categories · 5 total tags
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Ms Tirthroop Electrical Vs. Ms T. T. BladesDisposedUnrecognized case typeCity Civil Court, Mumbai, MaharashtraHon'ble Court 04 Addl Sessions Judge
- Maryland Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mathura Shrikrishna SanduPendingCivil Miscellaneous ApplicationBombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleRegistrar(Os)/Prothonotary And Sr. Master
- Bandra Arunoday Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs. The State Of MaharashtraDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - DivisionHon'ble F.I. Rebello, Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice J.H. Bhatia
- Pankaj Kishor Shah Vs. Champaklal Sarupchand ShahDisposedFirst AppealBombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble F.I. Rebello
- Smita P. Dalvi& Ors. Vs. Shri Ratnakar D. Patade& Ors.DisposedCivil AppealBombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble D.K. Deshmukh
- S. K. Corporation Vs. Nehru Nagar Swanand Chs Ltd And OrsDisposedUnrecognized case typeCity Civil Court, Mumbai, MaharashtraHon'ble Court 01 Addl Sessions Judge
- Shri Ajjiappa E Khatavkar Vs. Ms Swastik Decors And OrsDisposedUnrecognized case typeCity Civil Court, Mumbai, MaharashtraHon'ble Court 56 Additional Sessions Judge
- Neela Narhari Chopadekar Vs. Parvati M Nivatkar& Ors.DisposedSecond AppealBombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble A.Y. Sakhare
- Jal Hormsji Hansotia Vs. Supreme Sukhdam And Associates& Ors.DisposedUnrecognized case typeBombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble R.Y. Ganoo
- Case 80424/1995DisposedFirst AppealBombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble S.M. Jhunjhunuwala
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Maharashtra
Principal High Court: Bombay High Court · Capital: Mumbai
Maharashtra is anchored by the Bombay High Court — established in 1862, one of India's three chartered High Courts — with principal seat at Mumbai and benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur and Goa (Panaji). The Court has Original and Appellate Side jurisdiction; commercial disputes above ₹3 lakh proceed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before the Commercial Division. Tenancy disputes follow the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; rural land matters the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Stamp duty is governed by the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, India's largest State Bar Council, regulates legal practice across the State.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. Chitins Vaithy's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. Chitins Vaithy handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. Chitins Vaithy been practising law?+
Chitins Vaithy was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/chitins-vaithy — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. Chitins Vaithy appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. Chitins Vaithy consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. Chitins Vaithy for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. Chitins Vaithy's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.