Where is Adv. Ca Bharat's chambers located?

Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.

What areas of practice does Adv. Ca Bharat handle?

Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.

How long has Adv. Ca Bharat been practising law?

Ca Bharat was enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/ca-bharat — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.

Which courts does Adv. Ca Bharat appear before?

Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.

What languages can Adv. Ca Bharat consult in?

Consultation languages are not yet listed.

How can I contact Adv. Ca Bharat for a paid consultation?

Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.

Is Adv. Ca Bharat's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?

No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

What kind of cases does Ca Bharat handle?

Ca Bharat's public-records case history is led by income tax appeal matters, alongside related civil and criminal proceedings.

Where does Ca Bharat appear in court?

The most frequent court of appearance on the public record is ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra. Other courts and tribunals are listed in the courts-of-appearance section above.

How many cases does Ca Bharat have on record?

Public e-courts data lists 39 cases. This is a factual snapshot — not a ranking or endorsement.

Where is Ca Bharat based?

Ca Bharat's most active jurisdiction is Mumbai, Delhi (NCT).

How can I consult Ca Bharat?

Use the “Ask a paid question” or “Book consultation” buttons above. Initial communication is platform-mediated for safety; engagement letter terms apply.

Adv. Ca Bharat

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council: Bar Council of Delhi
Enrollment No: ECOURTS-IMPORT/ca-bharat
Enrolled: Jan 2015
Based in: Delhi (NCT)

Years from enrolment

Courts registered

Languages

Public answers

Adv. Ca Bharat is one of 9,064 verified advocates listing Delhi (NCT) as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ Information on this page has been provided by the advocate as factual disclosure under the 2008 carve-out to BCI Rule 36. It is not an advertisement or a solicitation.

About

Public-records snapshot

Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 23 Jun 2026

Cases on record

Public data

Disposed

92%

Pending

Courts engaged

5 case types

Outcome profile

36 closed · 3 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

Tribunals & Commissions

6 courts · 35 matters · 95% of total

District & subordinate courts

2 courts · 2 matters · 5% of total

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Mumbai21 Bangalore8 Pune3 Jodhpur2 Aurangabad1

Practice composition

5 case categories · 32 total tags

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

M/S. Console Components (India ) P. Ltd,Mumbai Vs. Tds Cpc, Ghaziabad
DisposedIncome Tax Appeal
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member
M/S. Console Components (India ) P. Ltd,Mumbai Vs. Tds Cpc, Ghaziabad
DisposedUnrecognized case type
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member
M/S. Console Components (India) Pvt. Ltd,Mumbai Vs. Tds Cpc, Uttar Pradesh
DisposedUnrecognized case type
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member
M/S. Console Components (India) Pvt. Ltd,Mumbai Vs. Tds Cpc, Mumbai
DisposedUnrecognized case type
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member
M/S. Console Components (India ) P. Ltd,Mumbai Vs. Tds Cpc, Ghaziabad
DisposedUnrecognized case type
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member
M/S. Console Components (India) Pvt. Ltd,Mumbai Vs. Tds, Cpc, , Uttar Pradesh
DisposedUnrecognized case type
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member
Yogesh Parashram Pangarkar,,Pune Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward - 11(2),, Pune
DisposedIncome Tax Appeal
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune, Maharashtra - PUN
Hon'ble Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Accountant Member, Hon'ble R S Syal, Vice President
Dimple Rajesh Oswal,Pune Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 5(1), Pune
DisposedIncome Tax Appeal
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune, Maharashtra - PUN
Hon'ble Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Vice President, Hon'ble Manish Borad, Accountant Member
Heritage Sagar Enterprises,Mumbai Vs. Joint Cit Rang 22 (1), Mumbai
DisposedIncome Tax Appeal
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Maharishi, Accountant Member, Hon'ble Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member
Ganesharam Galbaram Mali ,Mumbai Vs. Dcit Central Circle 4(2), Mumbai
DisposedIncome Tax Appeal
ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra - MUM
Hon'ble Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Judicial Member, Hon'ble Shri Jagadish, Accountant Member

Ca Bharat·Compiled from publicly available court records·4 pages of case history (≈ 40 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Delhi

Principal High Court: Delhi High Court · Capital: New Delhi

The Delhi High Court (established 1966) is the principal court for the National Capital Territory. It has Original Civil jurisdiction up to ₹2 crore and Appellate jurisdiction over the District Courts. The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 governs newer tenancies (older premises continue under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958). Stamp duty follows the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Delhi amendments. The Supreme Court of India, NCLT Principal Bench, the Competition Commission of India, the National Green Tribunal Principal Bench, the Securities Appellate Tribunal and the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench are all in Delhi. The Bar Council of Delhi regulates the profession.

All advocates in Delhi (NCT) →

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

Where is Adv. Ca Bharat's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
What areas of practice does Adv. Ca Bharat handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
How long has Adv. Ca Bharat been practising law?+
Ca Bharat was enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/ca-bharat — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
Which courts does Adv. Ca Bharat appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
What languages can Adv. Ca Bharat consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.
How can I contact Adv. Ca Bharat for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
Is Adv. Ca Bharat's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in

Other advocates in Delhi (NCT)

Browse by category

Get in touch

Engagement letter terms apply. Initial communication is platform-mediated for safety.

Modes available

✓ Video consultation (LiveKit)
✓ Phone consultation (masked number)
✓ In-person at chambers

At a glance

Ca Bharat has 39 cases on the public e-courts record, with the primary practice based in Delhi (NCT).
Most frequent court of appearance: ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra (20 matters).
Cases on record span 8 distinct courts/tribunals.
Most-handled case category: Income Tax Appeal.
Public records show 4 pages of case history for this advocate.

Frequently asked

›What kind of cases does Ca Bharat handle?
Ca Bharat's public-records case history is led by income tax appeal matters, alongside related civil and criminal proceedings.
›Where does Ca Bharat appear in court?
The most frequent court of appearance on the public record is ITAT - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, Maharashtra. Other courts and tribunals are listed in the courts-of-appearance section above.
›How many cases does Ca Bharat have on record?
Public e-courts data lists 39 cases. This is a factual snapshot — not a ranking or endorsement.
›Where is Ca Bharat based?
Ca Bharat's most active jurisdiction is Mumbai, Delhi (NCT).
›How can I consult Ca Bharat?
Use the “Ask a paid question” or “Book consultation” buttons above. Initial communication is platform-mediated for safety; engagement letter terms apply.

Information on this page is published by the advocate as factual disclosure under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out. We do not host client testimonials, star ratings, or rankings.