AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Bahekar Vs

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/bahekar-vs
Enrolled
Jan 2015
Based in
Maharashtra
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Bahekar Vs is one of 80,671 verified advocates listing Maharashtra as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ Information on this page has been provided by the advocate as factual disclosure under the 2008 carve-out to BCI Rule 36. It is not an advertisement or a solicitation.

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 21 Jun 2026
Cases on record
2,767
Public data
Disposed
2,251
81%
Pending
516
19%
Courts engaged
30
12 case types
Outcome profile
2,251 closed · 516 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Practice composition

12 case categories · 1,949 total tags

+ 4 other case types tracked

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Shakilabee Sk.Ahsanoddin Vs. Sk.Ahsanoddin @ Bbalu Sk.Harunnodin
    DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)
    Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chikhli, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C., Hon'ble Chikhli
  2. Bsnl Chikhli. Vs. Pso Chikhli
    DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)
    Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chikhli, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C., Hon'ble Chikhli
  3. Mandakini Bajirao Bhokre Vs. Bajirao Aashru Bhokre
    DisposedCivil Suit
    Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chikhli, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C., Hon'ble Chikhli
  4. Lokesh Kumar Saha Vs. State Government
    DisposedBail Application
    Additional District and Sessions Court Dongargarh, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
    Hon'ble District And Sessions Judge Dongargarh
  5. Sangita Vikas Wayal Vs. Vilas Sheshraoo Wayal
    DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)
    Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chikhli, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C., Hon'ble Chikhli
  6. Sau Sarika Ramdas Sabale Vs. Ramdas Limbaji Sabale
    DisposedDomestic Violence Case
    Civil Court Junior Division, Mehkar, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.
  7. Samadhan Ramlal Bachhire Vs. Secretary Gram Panchayat Parda
    DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)
    Civil Court Junior Division, Mehkar, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.
  8. Mungsaji Maharaj Sahakari Path Sanstha Branch Deulgaon Mali Through Recovery Officer Satish Z More Vs. Prabhakar Digambar Magar
    PendingCriminal Complaint Case
    Civil Court Junior Division, Mehkar, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble 2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.
  9. Shaikh Firoz Shaikh Ajis Vs. Police Station Officer Mehkar
    DisposedCriminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)
    Civil Court Junior Division, Mehkar, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.
  10. Shrimati Indubai Bhaskar Misal Vs. Nil
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    Civil Court Junior Division, Mehkar, Buldhana, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.
Bahekar Vs·Compiled from publicly available court records·277 pages of case history (≈ 2,770 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Maharashtra

Principal High Court: Bombay High Court · Capital: Mumbai

Maharashtra is anchored by the Bombay High Court — established in 1862, one of India's three chartered High Courts — with principal seat at Mumbai and benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur and Goa (Panaji). The Court has Original and Appellate Side jurisdiction; commercial disputes above ₹3 lakh proceed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before the Commercial Division. Tenancy disputes follow the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; rural land matters the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Stamp duty is governed by the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, India's largest State Bar Council, regulates legal practice across the State.

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Bahekar Vs's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Bahekar Vs handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Bahekar Vs been practising law?+
    Bahekar Vs was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/bahekar-vs — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Bahekar Vs appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Bahekar Vs consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Bahekar Vs for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Bahekar Vs's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in