AAskadvocates.in

Adv. As Dadwal

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/as-dadwal
Enrolled
Jan 2015
Based in
Uttar Pradesh
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. As Dadwal is one of 60,966 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ Information on this page has been provided by the advocate as factual disclosure under the 2008 carve-out to BCI Rule 36. It is not an advertisement or a solicitation.

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 23 Jun 2026
Cases on record
24,722
Public data
Disposed
21,027
85%
Pending
3,695
15%
Courts engaged
141
43 case types
Outcome profile
21,027 closed · 3,695 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Practice composition

43 case categories · 20,160 total tags

+ 35 other case types tracked

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Ram Kishan Shandil Vs. Ram Kishan Shandil
    DisposedCivil Miscellaneous Application
    Civil Judge (Senior Division), Una, Himachal Pradesh
    Hon'ble Civil Judge Court No. 2, Hon'ble Una
  2. Bindu Dogra Vs. State
    PendingCivil Miscellaneous Application
    High Court of Himachal Pradesh at, Shimla
  3. Malkiat Singh Vs. Karnail Singh
    DisposedExecution Application (Civil)
    Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court, Mukerian, Hoshiarpur, Punjab
    Hon'ble Civil Judge (Junior Division)
  4. Chanan Singh Vs. Joginder Singh
    DisposedCivil Revision Petition
    Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court, Mukerian, Hoshiarpur, Punjab
    Hon'ble Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)
  5. Geetech Corporation Vs. Dtdc Express Limited
    DisposedUnrecognized case type
    City Civil Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra
    Hon'ble Court 59 Addl Sessions Judge
  6. Narinder Singh Vs. State Of Punjab
    PendingWrit Petition (Civil)
    High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh - Single
As Dadwal·Compiled from publicly available court records·2,473 pages of case history (≈ 24,730 entries)

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Uttar Pradesh

Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow

The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. As Dadwal's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. As Dadwal handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. As Dadwal been practising law?+
    As Dadwal was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/as-dadwal — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. As Dadwal appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. As Dadwal consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. As Dadwal for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. As Dadwal's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in