AAskadvocates.in

Adv. Amit Nayek

✓ BCI verified

Profile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.

State Bar Council
Bar Council of Rajasthan
Enrollment No
ECOURTS-IMPORT/amit-nayek
Enrolled
Jan 2015
Based in
Rajasthan
11
Years from enrolment
0
Courts registered
0
Languages
0
Public answers

Adv. Amit Nayek is one of 23,218 verified advocates listing Rajasthan as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.

⚖️ Information on this page has been provided by the advocate as factual disclosure under the 2008 carve-out to BCI Rule 36. It is not an advertisement or a solicitation.

About

Public-records snapshot
Compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate. · Last refreshed 23 Jun 2026
Cases on record
7
Public data
Disposed
7
100%
Pending
0
0%
Courts engaged
1
1 case types
Outcome profile
7 closed · 0 open

Court hierarchy

Where the practice operates, grouped by tier

District & subordinate courts
1 court · 7 matters · 100% of total

Cities of practice

Jurisdictions where matters are recorded

Practice composition

1 case categories · 7 total tags

Recent matters

Last 10 cases visible on the public record

  1. Sunita Vs. Dinesh
    DisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)
    District & Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh Churu, Rajasthan
    Hon'ble Adj I
  2. Neelam Vs. Deepak
    DisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)
    District & Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh Churu, Rajasthan
    Hon'ble Adj I
  3. Sunita Vs. Krishan Kumar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)
    District & Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh Churu, Rajasthan
    Hon'ble Adj Ii
  4. Rajbala Vs. Rahul
    DisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)
    District & Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh Churu, Rajasthan
    Hon'ble Adj Ii
  5. Mamta Kumari Vs. Vinod Kumar
    DisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)
    District & Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh Churu, Rajasthan
    Hon'ble Adj Ii
  6. Babita Kumar Vs. Indraj
    DisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)
    District & Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh Churu, Rajasthan
    Hon'ble Adj Ii
  7. Manju Vs. Gopi Ram
    DisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)
    District & Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh Churu, Rajasthan
    Hon'ble Adj I
Amit Nayek·Compiled from publicly available court records

Areas of practice

As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.

No practice areas listed.

Courts & tribunals

No court registrations listed.

Practising law in Rajasthan

Principal High Court: Rajasthan High Court · Capital: Jaipur

The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur, with the bench at Jaipur, was established in 1949. The Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 and Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 are State-specific. Land revenue and tenancy litigation is voluminous. The Bar Council of Rajasthan maintains an online enrolled-advocate search (rare among State councils). The Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 governs charitable trusts in the State.

Education

No education listed.

Frequently asked questions

  • Where is Adv. Amit Nayek's chambers located?+
    Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.
  • What areas of practice does Adv. Amit Nayek handle?+
    Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.
  • How long has Adv. Amit Nayek been practising law?+
    Amit Nayek was enrolled with the Bar Council of Rajasthan in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/amit-nayek — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.
  • Which courts does Adv. Amit Nayek appear before?+
    Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.
  • What languages can Adv. Amit Nayek consult in?+
    Consultation languages are not yet listed.
  • How can I contact Adv. Amit Nayek for a paid consultation?+
    Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.
  • Is Adv. Amit Nayek's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
    No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.

Contact & chambers

No office listed.

Explore more on Askadvocates.in