Adv. A Mandlik
✓ BCI verifiedProfile compiled from publicly available court records. Not yet claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/a-mandlik
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Uttar Pradesh
Adv. A Mandlik is one of 57,167 verified advocates listing Uttar Pradesh as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Bombay High CourtAurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra2,985
- Civil Court Junior DivisionKopergaon, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra647
- Civil Miscellaneous Application538
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)525
- Civil Court Junior DivisionAmbad, Jalna, Maharashtra296
- Bail Application206
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
37 case categories · 6,644 total tags
- Writ Petition (Civil)2,12432%
- Civil Appeal1,42821%
- Civil Suit71711%
- Criminal Complaint Case68410%
- Second Appeal4026%
- First Appeal3826%
- Criminal Appeal (DC)2504%
- Writ Appeal911%
+ 29 other case types tracked
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- State-4-25 Vs. Imran Shabbir KhanPendingCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Pune, MaharashtraHon'ble 9th Joint Civil Judge J.D., Hon'ble Jmfc Pune.
- Inox Leisure Ltd. Vs. Vinod J TiwariDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble Sandeep V. Marne
- Inox Leisure Ltd. Vs. Dhanu Ganpat LokhandeDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble Sandeep V. Marne
- Inox Leisure Ltd. Vs. Dnyaneshwar Pandurang GosaviDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - SingleHon'ble Sandeep V. Marne
- Kumudni W/O Kiran Adrichtria Vs. Kiran S/O Manoharlal AdchitraDisposedMiscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)District and Sessions Court, Dewas, Sehore, Madhya Pradesh
- Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj Vs. Sau. Rajashree Arvind DeoreDisposedWrit Petition (Civil)Bombay High Court, Mumbai, Maharashtra - DivisionHon'ble D.K. Deshmukh, Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta
- Sailu Lachmanna Natewar Vs. Sant Sevalal Shikshan Prasarak Mandal An DorsDisposedCivil AppealBombay High Court, Aurangabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra - DivisionHon'ble V R Kingaonkar, Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice A P Deshpande
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Uttar Pradesh
Principal High Court: Allahabad High Court · Capital: Lucknow
The Allahabad High Court (established 1866) is one of India's oldest, with the principal seat at Prayagraj and the Lucknow Bench. It is among the largest High Courts by sanctioned strength and pending cases. The UP Revenue Code, 2006 (replacing the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950) governs rural land. The UP Stamp Act and the UP Tenancy Acts apply. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has well over 100,000 enrolled advocates.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. A Mandlik's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. A Mandlik handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. A Mandlik been practising law?+
A Mandlik was enrolled with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/a-mandlik — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. A Mandlik appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. A Mandlik consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. A Mandlik for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. A Mandlik's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.