Adv. A Itankar
✓ BCI verifiedAuto-imported from public e-courts records. Profile not yet verified or claimed by the advocate.
- State Bar Council
- Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
- Enrollment No
- ECOURTS-IMPORT/a-itankar
- Enrolled
- Jan 2015
- Based in
- Maharashtra
Adv. A Itankar is one of 101,826 verified advocates listing Maharashtra as their primary State on Askadvocates.in.
About
Court hierarchy
Where the practice operates, grouped by tier
- Chief Judicial MagistrateNagpur, Maharashtra557
- Family CourtNagpur, Maharashtra320
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application (DC)298
- District and Sessions CourtNagpur, Maharashtra238
- Civil Miscellaneous Application146
- Bombay High CourtNagpur Bench, Nagpur, Maharashtra69
Cities of practice
Jurisdictions where matters are recorded
Practice composition
15 case categories · 646 total tags
- Criminal Complaint Case41564%
- Criminal Revision518%
- Civil Suit487%
- Criminal Appeal396%
- Motor Accident Claims Appeal254%
- Miscellaneous Judicial Case (Civil)183%
- First Appeal142%
- Writ Petition (Civil)132%
+ 7 other case types tracked
Recent matters
Last 10 cases visible on the public record
- Sahakar Finance Investment Co.Ltd. Vs. Omprakash Ganeshprasad SharmaDisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, MaharashtraHon'ble 2nd Jt.C.J. J.D And Jmfc Nagpur
- Vishal Nagri Sah Patsantha Mrd Koradi Vs. Tejram Tulsiram Khaire And TwoPendingExecution Application (Civil)Civil Court Junior Division, Kamptee, Nagpur, MaharashtraHon'ble Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
- State Vs. Avinash N.Nagrikar 7DisposedSessions CaseDistrict and Sessions Court, Nagpur, MaharashtraHon'ble Adhoc District Judge-11 And Addl. Sessions Judge
- State Of Mah. Vs. Moreshwar Bagmare 2DisposedCriminal Complaint CaseChief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, MaharashtraHon'ble 8th Jt.Cjjd, Hon'ble And Jmfc Nagpur
- State Of Maharashtra Vs. Panalal Banode 6DisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict and Sessions Court, Nagpur, MaharashtraHon'ble Adhoc District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge
- State Of Maharashtra Vs. Kishor R. Chauhan OthersDisposedUnrecognized case typeDistrict and Sessions Court, Nagpur, MaharashtraHon'ble Adhoc District Judge-6 And Assistant Sessions Judge, Hon'ble Nagpur
Areas of practice
As permitted under the BCI Rule 36 (2008) carve-out — these are factually-listed areas of practice, not specialisations.
No practice areas listed.
Courts & tribunals
No court registrations listed.
Practising law in Maharashtra
Principal High Court: Bombay High Court · Capital: Mumbai
Maharashtra is anchored by the Bombay High Court — established in 1862, one of India's three chartered High Courts — with principal seat at Mumbai and benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur and Goa (Panaji). The Court has Original and Appellate Side jurisdiction; commercial disputes above ₹3 lakh proceed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before the Commercial Division. Tenancy disputes follow the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; rural land matters the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Stamp duty is governed by the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, India's largest State Bar Council, regulates legal practice across the State.
Education
No education listed.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Adv. A Itankar's chambers located?+
Chambers location is not listed on the public profile. Contact the advocate through the platform to arrange a meeting.What areas of practice does Adv. A Itankar handle?+
Areas of practice are not yet listed on the profile.How long has Adv. A Itankar been practising law?+
A Itankar was enrolled with the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in 2015 under enrolment number ECOURTS-IMPORT/a-itankar — 11 years from enrolment as of this update.Which courts does Adv. A Itankar appear before?+
Courts of appearance are not yet listed on the profile.What languages can Adv. A Itankar consult in?+
Consultation languages are not yet listed.How can I contact Adv. A Itankar for a paid consultation?+
Three channels are available via Askadvocates.in: (i) paid written Q&A (₹199 / ₹499 / ₹999 tiers with 24-h / 6-h / 1-h SLA), (ii) video, phone or in-person consultation booking (advocate's professional fee plus a flat ₹100 platform service fee), and (iii) a platform-mediated message. Engagement letter terms apply to any consultation that follows.Is Adv. A Itankar's listing on Askadvocates.in an advertisement?+
No. The information on this page is published as factual disclosure permitted by the 2008 amendment to Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Askadvocates.in does not host advertisements on behalf of advocates, paid placement, star ratings or client testimonials.
Contact & chambers
No office listed.